35.20Schedules A and B

Schedule A - Description Of Interconnection Facilities

The NYISO – PJM Coordination Agreement covers the PJM – NYISO Interconnection Facilities under the Operational Control of the NYISO and PJM.  For Operational Control purposes, the point of demarcation for each of the Interconnection Facilities listed below is the point at which each Interconnection Facility crosses the PJM-New York State boundary, except as noted below.

The PJM-NYISO Interconnection contains twenty-three (23) alternating current (“AC”) Interconnection Facilities, seven (7) of which form one (1) AC pseudo-tie[1]; and further contains one (1) HVDC Interconnection Facility. These are tabulated below:

NY/PJM AC Interconnection Facilities:

PJMNYISODesignated   (kV)Common Meter Point

BranchburgRamapo5018              500              Ramapo

Closter Sparkill751              69              Closter

E. Sayre N. Waverly956              115              E. Sayre

E. Towanda Hillside70              230              Hillside

Erie East South Ripley69              230              South Ripley

FranklinSugar LoafSJ              115              Sugar Loaf

FranklinSugar LoafSD              115              Sugar Loaf

Harings CornersBurns702              138               Harings

Harings Corners Nanuet45              34              Harings

Harings CornersW. Nyak701              69              Harings

Homer City Watercure30              345              Homer

Homer CityStolle Road37              345              Homer

Hudson FarragutC3403              345              Farragut

Hudson FarragutB3402              345              Farragut

Linden GoethalsA2253              230              Goethals

Montvale Pearl River491              69              Montvale

Montvale Blue Hill44              69              Montvale

Montvale Blue Hill43              69              Montvale

RECONYISOAC Pseudo-TieVariousO&R EMS

SayervilleNewbridgeHVDC-Tie500New Bridge

S. Mahwah Hilburn65              69              S. Mahwah

S. Mahwah S. Mahwah138/345              138/345S. Mahway

S. Mahwah Ramapo51              138              S. Mahwah

Tiffany Goudey952              115              Goudey

Warren Falconer171              115              Warren

Schedule B - Other Existing Agreements:

1.0Lake Erie Emergency Redispatch (LEER)

2.0RAMAPO PHASE ANGLE REGULATOR OPERATING PROCEDURE prepared by the NYPP/PJM Circulation Study Operating Committee.

3.0Operating Protocol for the Implementation of Commission Opinion No. 476, Docket No. EL02-23-000 (Phase II), New York Independent System Operator, Inc., FERC Electric Tariff, Original Vol. No. 2, Attachment M-1.

4.0Northeastern ISO/RTO Coordination of Planning Protocol

5.0Inter Control Area Transaction Agreement.

6.0Procedures to Protect for Loss of Phase II Imports (effective January 16, 2007, pursuant to Order issued January 12, 2007, in FERC Docket No. ER07-231-000).

7.0Unscheduled Transmission Service Agreement, PJM Interconnection L.L.C, Rate Schedule No. 30, Effective Date January 1, 2001.

Schedule C - Operating Protocol for the Implementation Of Con Ed – PJM Transmission Service Agreements

1.1This “Operating Protocol” establishes procedures for the planning, operation, control, and scheduling of energy between the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (“NYISO”) and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”) (collectively, the “Parties”), associated with two Long-term Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Agreements (“TSAs”) entered into by Consolidated Edison Company of New York (“ConEd”) and PJM, dated April 18, 2008, executed in connection with the rollover of contracts dated May 22, 1975 (as amended May 9, 1978) and May 8, 1978 between ConEd and Public Service Electric & Gas Company (“PSE&G”).  The TSA designated Original Service Agreement No. 1874 is referred to herein as the 400 MW transaction and the TSA designated Original Service Agreement No. 1873 is referred to as the 600 MW transaction.  The two contracts are referred to collectively as the “600/400 MW transactions.”

1.1.1The 400 MW transaction.  The 400 MW transaction has the same level of firmness as other firm transactions, except as provided in section 1.3 of this Operating Protocol.

1.1.2The 600 MW transaction.  The 600 MW transaction shall have the same level of firmness as other firm transactions.

1.2This Operating Protocol shall be used by the NYISO and PJM in preparing to operate, and operating in real-time, to the hourly flow of energy between them pursuant to the 600/400 MW transactions as established by this Operating Protocol.

1.3During system emergencies, the appropriate emergency procedures of the NYISO and PJM, if necessary, shall take priority over the provisions of this Operating Protocol.  The NYISO and PJM shall have the authority to implement their respective emergency procedures in whatever order is required to ensure overall system reliability.  Without limiting the foregoing, the order of load relief measures and transaction reductions when there is an emergency in the PJM Mid-Atlantic Area will be:

• Calling of Emergency Load Response

• Voltage reduction

• Pro-rata load shed and reduction of the 600/400 MW transactions[2]

In addition, if PJM declares an emergency condition that arises from outages on the PSE&G system, the NYISO and PJM may agree to deliver up to 400 MW to Goethals for re-delivery to Hudson via the NYISO’s system.  Such emergency re-deliveries shall not be considered in the calculation of the Real-Time Market Desired Flow under Appendices 1 and 3 of this Operating Protocol.

1.4All aspects of this Operating Protocol are subject to the dispute resolution procedures set forth in the Joint Operating Agreement Among and Between New York Independent System Operator, Inc., and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

1.5The Parties will review all aspects of this Operating Protocol annually.

1.6Attached and included as part of this Operating Protocol are the following appendices:  Appendix 1 – Process Flow, Appendix 2 – Transmission Constraints and Outages Associated with the Contracts, Appendix 3 – The Day-Ahead Market and Real-Time Market Desired Flow Calculation, Appendix 4 – Planning Procedures, Appendix 5 – Operation of the PARs, Appendix 6 – Distribution of Flows Associated with Implementation of Day-Ahead and Real Time Market Desired Flows, Appendix 7 – References, and Appendix 8 – Definitions.

[1]WEQ-007 “Inadvertent Interchange Payback Standards,” North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB), on-line at www.naesb.org.

[2] In a maximum generation emergency in the PJM Mid-Atlantic Area where PSE&G load needs to be curtailed, the PSE&G load would be curtailed pro-rata with curtailment of the ConEd requested service (and other firm service on the system). But, if NYISO is not also in a capacity emergency, the desired flow on ABC will be reduced by up to 400 MW to the extent necessary to avoid a PSEG load curtailment. ConEd may upgrade the transmission service for the 400 MW transaction to eliminate the reduction of the 400 MW transaction prior to load shed as described above by requesting such upgraded service and funding all necessary transmission upgrades as required by Part II and Part VI of the PJM OATT.  The 600 MW transaction shall be reduced in the same manner as all other firm transactions in PJM.