Docket Nos. ER25-198-001 and ER25-198-000 1
193 FERC ¶ 61,243
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20426
December 29, 2025
In Reply Refer To:
New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
ER25-198-000
Van Ness Feldman
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 6000
Washington, DC 20006
Attention: Gary D. Bachman
Attorney for New York Power Authority
The standard of review for any change to the Settlement proposed by a Settling Party shall be the “public interest” application of the just and reasonable standard set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Serv. Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956), and Fed. Power Comm’n v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), as clarified in Morgan Stanley Capital Grp., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cnty., Wash., 554 U.S. 527 (2008), and refined in NRG Power Mktg. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm’n, 558 U.S. 165 (2010). The ordinary just and reasonable standard of review (rather than the “public interest” standard), as clarified in Morgan Stanley Capital Grp., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cnty., Wash., 554 U.S. 527 (2008), applies to any changes to the settlement sought by the Commission acting sua sponte, the Settling Parties acting unanimously, or at the request of a non-settling party or a non-party to this proceeding.
By direction of the Commission.
Carlos D. Clay,
Deputy Secretary.
[1] N.Y. Power Auth., 193 FERC ¶ 63,026 (2025).
[2] N.Y. Power Auth., 189 FERC ¶ 61,228 (2024).
[3] See Elec. Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, 124 FERC ¶ 61,270 (2008), clarified, Order No. 714-A, 147 FERC ¶ 61,115 (2014).