Docket Nos. ER24-1614-002 and ER24-1614-000 1
189 FERC ¶ 61,210
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20426
December 19, 2024
In Reply Refer To:
Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
Docket Nos. ER24-1614-002
ER24-1614-000
Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
4 Irving Place
New York, NY 10003
Attention: Susan J. LoFrumento
The standard of review for any changes to this Settlement proposed by a Settling Party shall be the “public interest” application of the just and reasonable standard set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Serv. Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956) and Fed. Power Comm’n v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), as clarified in Morgan Stanley Cap. Grp. Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cnty., 554 U.S. 527 (2008) (“Morgan Stanley”), and refined in NRG Power Mktg., LLC v. Maine Pub. Utilities Comm’n, 558 U.S. 165, 174-75 (2010). The ordinary just and reasonable standard of review (rather than the “public interest” standard), as clarified in Morgan Stanley shall apply to any changes to this Settlement sought by the Commission acting sua sponte or at the request of a non-Settling Party or a non-party to any of these proceedings.
By direction of the Commission
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[1] 16 U.S.C. § 824d.
[2] 18 C.F.R. § 35.13 (2024).
[3] NYISO, NYISO Tariffs, NYISO OATT, § 6.10.11 (OATT Schedule 10 - Attach. 5 - Rate Mechanism for Recovery) (0.0.0); id. NYISO OATT, §§ 6.19.10-6.19.10.2.1 (Schedule 19 - Attach. 5 - Rate Mechanism) (0.0.0); id. NYISO OATT, § 6.19.10.2.2 (Schedule 19 - Orange and Rockland Utilities) (0.0.0).
[4] Orange & Rockland Utils., Inc., 187 FERC ¶ 61,110 (2024) (Initial Order).
[5] O&R, Explanatory Statement at 1.
[6] Orange & Rockland Utils., Inc., 189 FERC ¶ 63,005 (2024).
[7] Initial Order, 187 FERC ¶ 61,110. Specifically, among other things, the terms of the Settlement render moot the issue of O&R’s request for approval of the RTO Participation Adder and O&R agrees to waive its right to a RTO Participation Adder. Settlement §§ 2.1, 3.2(b), 3.3(b).
[8] Article 5 of the Settlement states that the settlement shall be effective on the date the Commission approves the O&R Implementation Filing(s) without material modifications or conditions.
[9] Article 3.2(b) of the Rate Schedule 10 Settlement states that “[t]he stated ROE values specified in Section 3.2(a), above are all inclusive, and shall not include any ROE incentive adders.” We also note that Article 3.2(b) of the Rate Schedule 19 Settlement states that “[n]o Schedule 19 Projects shall be eligible for, nor shall any such Projects seek, any incentive ROE adders.”
[10] See Elec. Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, 124 FERC ¶ 61,270 (2008), order on reh’g, Order No. 714-A, 147 FERC ¶ 61,115 (2014). O&R and NYISO are reminded to use an eTariff Record Effective Priority Order number higher than used in their respective dockets to ensure the tariff records approved as part of the Settlement become the effective rate.